CS 248 - Introduction to Computer Graphics

Autumn Quarter, 2001

Marc Levoy

Handout #6

- Ideal sampling
- Ideal reconstruction
- Undersampling
- Solution #1: raise the sampling rate
- Solution #2: bandlimit the signal
- Poor bandlimiting
- Poor reconstruction
- Summary

We'll cover this handout on Tuesday, so bring your copy to class.

Fourier analysis can be applied to any complex function that satisfies the Dirichlet conditions (as mentioned in class). However, to simplify the plots in this handout, we consider only functions that are real and even (meaning symmetric about x = 0). The Fourier transform of a real and even function is also real and even. We will therefore plot only the real part of a function and its Fourier transform, and we will omit the x < 0 half of both plots. For example, the Fourier transform (plot #2) of a cosine (plot #1) consists of two impulses: one at omega = 1/p, and one at omega = -1/p, but only the first of these impulses is shown.

Although we do not manipulate impulses or impulse trains algebraically in this course, you might be wondering how they are defined. The single impulse function, dirac-delta(x), is defined as the limit of a rect function as its width goes to zero. It is drawn as a single upwards-pointing arrow of unit height located at x = 0. (The rect function, you may remember, has unit height, unit width, and is centered around x = 0.) The impulse does not have a value per se at x = 0, but is instead defined as having value = 0 for x <> 0 and integral (from negative to positive infinity) = 1. The impulse train, a.k.a. shah(x), is defined as a sum of shifted impulses. Its Fourier transform, surprisingly, is also an impulse train, where the impulses are spaced as shown above. If you're interested in more details on rects, impulses, impulse trains, and their Fourier transforms, look at these notes from CS 348B.

For proof of the surprising fact that the Fourier transform of a sinc function (plot #11) is a rect function (plot #12), click here.

Given the relationship (shown in plots #7 and #8) of the spacing between impulses in an impulse train in the spatial versus the frequency domain, it follows that decreasing their spacing in the spatial domain (plot #21) will increase their spacing in the frequency domain (plot #22). This effect can be easily proven using the similarity theorem.

levoy@cs.stanford.edu