Undo and Erase Events as Indicators of Usability Problems


 

David Akers1,2, Matthew Simpson2, Robin Jeffries2, and Terry Winograd1

1 Stanford University, 2 Google Inc.

 

  Published in Proceedings of CHI 2009 (Best Paper Award)

Paper

PDF (0.6 MB)

 

Conference Presentation

PDF (2.1 MB)

 

Abstract

 

One approach to reducing the costs of usability testing is to facilitate the automatic detection of critical incidents: serious breakdowns in interaction that stand out during software use. This research evaluates the use of undo and erase events as indicators of critical incidents in Google SketchUp (a 3D-modeling application), measuring an indicator's usefulness by the numbers and types of usability problems discovered. We compared problems identified using undo and erase events to problems identified using the user-reported critical incident technique [Hartson and Castillo 1998]. In a within-subjects experiment with 35 participants, undo and erase episodes together revealed over 90% of the problems rated as severe, several of which would not have been discovered by self-report alone. Moreover, problems found by all three methods were rated as significantly more severe than those identified by only a subset of methods. These results suggest that undo and erase events will serve as useful complements to user-reported critical incidents for low cost usability evaluation of creation-oriented applications like SketchUp.

 

 


David Akers | Last updated April 11, 2009